COUNTY CHARTER GOVERNMENT STUDY

A. Overview.

1. Prior to 1968 all county governments were extensions of the State government and controlled by the legislature. The individual county elected officials had powers vested by and were “resident agents” of the State. The old system was a reflection of the fact that the majority of Floridians lived in small, rural and poor municipalities or unincorporated areas when Statehood was granted in 1845. In 1968 the Florida Constitution was amended, Article VIII, Section 1(f)], to include Charter Government at the county level known as “Home Rule”.

2. As Florida grew with larger cities developing at great distances from a remotely located capital in Tallahassee , the concept of “Home Rule” arose. Powers of self-Government were granted to specific counties which developed “Home Rule” Charters consistent with general and special laws and approved by referendum of the county electorate. This provided localized government closer to the people. Home Rule powers are subject to any future restrictions by the Legislature.

B. What Is A Charter?

Basically, a charter is a “constitution” for county government, similar to those at State and National levels. It is comparable to a city charter granted by the State giving municipalities governing and taxing authority. It recognizes the fact that the “one-size-fits all” approach mandated prior to 1968 did not allow for efficient and effective customization of self-government for counties across the wide variety of conditions that exist in modern Florida from Escambia to Miami-Dade or from Duval to Palm Beach Counties. Attachment A lists twenty of sixty-seven that currently have charters. It includes statistics concerning size of the county, number of cities and whether the “constitutional” status of elected officials was changed. Counties without charters only have the power of self-government provided by general or special law and Article VIII Section 1(g) of the Constitution.

C. How are County Charters Created? There are two alternatives*:

1. By Charter Commission. Title XI of the 2008 Florida Statutes, County Government and Intergovernmental Relations, Chapter 125, Part II, Sections 125.60 through 125.64 is Attachment B. It describes the formation of a Charter Commission by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) after receipt of a petition signed by at least 15 percent of the qualified voters. The Charter Commission, consisting of not less than 11 or more than 15 members appointed by the BCC, would have 18 months to present a proposed charter to the BCC.

2. By Ordinance. Title XI of the 2008 Florida Statutes, County Government and Intergovernmental Relations, Chapter 125, Part II, Sections 125.80 through 125.88 is Attachment C. It describes proposal of a charter by ordinance of the BCC. The 18 month time limitation does not apply to this alternative.

3. The Referendum. A charter proposed by either of the two methods listed above in 1 or 2 above must be approved by a majority vote of the county electors as described in FS 125.64 of Attachment B before it can be adopted.

*Actually a third option exists where a county charter could be introduced as a special act of the legislature by the county’s legislative delegation without a referendum. But this option is unlikely and generally not politically feasible.

D. Differences Between Non-Charter and Charter County Government.

Attachment D lists the ways in which the two forms of county government differ. No general statement should be made concerning merits of one form over the other for Okaloosa County unless the specific contents of a proposed charter are determined.  However, one generalization that can be made about charter counties is that they have a higher tax rate than non-charter counties. This may be explained by the fact that charter counties generally deliver a higher level of services than non-charter counties. Nevertheless, this allegation of higher tax levels is often used as a criticism of charter government.  

E. History of the Charter Government Effort in Okaloosa County .

A 15 member Charter Commission was appointed by the Okaloosa BCC in 1994 as result of a petition initiative, A proposed charter was drafted and submitted to electors in November of 1996. It was not approved by referendum with approximately 19,000 voting for and 38,000 against. Lack of support from the incumbent elected officials of Okaloosa County at that time was a factor in the Charter’s defeat. History of successful charter efforts in other counties shows that most are initiated from within the county government in order to engage the efficiencies and advantages that charter government can provide. Support of incumbent elected officials is vital unless it is offset by overwhelming citizen dissatisfaction with the operation of current government. A member of the committee that produced this study was the Chairman of the Charter Commission at the time of its dissolution in 1996. All records of the Charter Commission were transferred to the County.  

F. Areas of Interest for Okaloosa County Government

1. Sovereignty of County Elected Officials. A charter could retain their status as Constitutional Officers with duties and responsibilities as they presently exist. It could change their status to Charter Officers altering their duties and responsibilities; make their offices nonpartisan; make them appointed by the BCC instead of elected; or require their budgets be approved by the BCC. A charter could reduce most of their foundation in State law and replace it locally with Home Rule.

2. Accountability. A county charter can include provisions for recall of elected officials by petition for mismanagement or unsatisfactory performance. Citizens could propose county laws and ordinances for accountability subject to referendum.

3. Visibility. A charter could require public review of budget, programs and human resources of elected county officers by the BCC. It could make them subject to binding BCC audit and approval. A charter would require the County to create an Administrative Code detailing all regulations, policies and procedures.

4. Resource Allocation. Counties should not compete with cities for limited resources. A charter could require collaboration in areas of common interest as currently exists in the Library Cooperative. Means to reduce duplication of effort in other areas should be explored. These areas could be Law Enforcement, Waste Disposal, Water & Sewer, Storm Water Runoff, Code Enforcement, Road Construction & Maintenance, Information Technology, Parks and Recreation, etc….

5. County vs Municipal Charters. Any charter must specify how it coordinates with municipal charters already in existence. A city could be given the option of participating or county charter authority could stop at the city boundary. The County charter could be set as a minimum standard which the city could exceed if desired.  

G. References

1. Florida Constitution and Statutes 2008 as stated in paragraphs A, B and C above.

2. Florida Association of Counties Web Site; http://www.fl-counties.com/aboutflco/chartercounties.shtml

3. Okaloosa County Charter Commission Working Plan 1994.

H. Attachments:

1. A. Charter County Comparisons.

2. B. Florida Statutes Chapter 125, Part II, Sections 125.60-125.64.

3. C. Florida Statutes Chapter 125, Part II, Section 125.80-125.88.

4. D. Basic Differences Between Charter and Non-Charter Counties.

 

 

Home Page